Did. That suggestion was made earlier. Did not change anything. Here's a test which ran just fine (def x (evaluate_and (list true true))) (println "A" x) (def y (evaluate_and (list true false))) (println "B" y)
But, the moment I attempt to make a list with two functions in it, the code breaks and returns - without any errors - not a boolean, but the structure I passed it. On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:43 PM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote: > Those are functions that call booleans as functions. Try this: > > (defn simple-true [] true) > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 5:41 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org> > wrote: > >> Great points! >> They are filled with functions which look like this >> >> (defn simple_true [] (true)) >> >> They are not booleans but functions which return a boolean. >> Here is a list of two of those as produced by the code: >> >> (#object[ie4clj.Tests$simple_false 0x3a4621bd >> ie4clj.Tests$simple_false@3a4621bd] >> #object[ie4clj.Tests$simple_false 0x3a4621bd >> ie4clj.Tests$simple_false@3a4621bd]) >> >> Or maybe I missed something. >> >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:33 PM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote: >> >>> Your members list needs to be filled with things that can be called as >>> functions, since that's what that code snippet does, and booleans >>> definitely cannot be called as functions. That's what the error means, >>> there's a boolean in your list and it's trying to cast it to an IFn (a >>> Clojure function interface) when it is called as (member). >>> >>> Can you show the lists you construct? Are they full of functions that >>> take no arguments? Do you want the lists to be able to contain booleans too? >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 2:57 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Cora >>>> >>>> (every? (fn [member] (member)) members) >>>> works fine on [constantly true & false >>>> but fails with >>>> java.lang.Boolean cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn >>>> on the lists I construct. >>>> >>>> In truth, I thought all the code was working, but that turned out ot be >>>> an artifact of the test I designed. When I changed the test conditions, >>>> evaluate_and failed. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 5:00 PM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello again Jack, >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 6:21 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> (every? eval members) does not appear to work on a list of functions >>>>>> designed to evaluate to a boolean. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If members is a list of functions then you would do: >>>>> >>>>> (every? (fn [member] (member)) members) >>>>> >>>>> Showing it work here: >>>>> >>>>> (every? (fn [member] (member)) [(constantly true) (constantly true)]) >>>>> ;; => true >>>>> (every? (fn [member] (member)) [(constantly true) (constantly false)]) >>>>> ;; => false >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> That code is used in a function evaluateAnd >>>>>> >>>>>> Two simple tests >>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true true] --> true >>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true false] --> nil (why not "false" as the every? >>>>>> examples show?) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In Clojure things are either "truthy" or "falsey", and the only >>>>> "false" values are false and nil so returning nil is usually fine. >>>>> Everything else is "truthy". I wouldn't worry about it returning nil since >>>>> other things were broken anyways. >>>>> >>>>> https://clojure.org/guides/learn/flow#_truth >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> The specific code for building the list of functions is this >>>>>> >>>>>> (def x (atom [])) >>>>>> (let [result (list (ref SimpleTrue) (ref SimpleFalse))] >>>>>> (println "BAL1" result ) >>>>>> (reset! x result) >>>>>> ) >>>>>> (println "BAL2" @x ) >>>>>> >>>>>> (@x) <<<< returns the atom's value >>>>>> >>>>>> And the final println is this >>>>>> >>>>>> BAL2 (#object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x335b5620 {:status :ready, :val >>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue 0x6eb2384f >>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue@6eb2384f]}] >>>>>> #object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x3c9c0d96 {:status :ready, :val >>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse 0x31dadd46 >>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse@31dadd46]}]) >>>>>> >>>>>> evaluateAnd never saw the result, with this error message >>>>>> >>>>>> clojure.lang.PersistentList cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Refs are the wrong thing to use here. In fact I'd stay away from atoms >>>>> and refs unless you have multiple threads that need to mutate the same >>>>> values. They're just confusing things now, I think. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The test which fails is this >>>>>> >>>>>> (def result (evaluateAnd (buildAndList) )) <<< fails here >>>>>> (println "bar" result) >>>>>> (result) >>>>>> >>>>>> The googleverse seems to agree that there are extra parens around the >>>>>> value. Google isn't giving me an obvious way to take that value outside >>>>>> of >>>>>> its surrounding parens (bal2 above). >>>>>> Still looking, and hoping that solves the problem. >>>>>> Maybe there's a way to go back to buildAndList and not return the >>>>>> value with parens. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think a key thing to explain is that in Clojure generally you're not >>>>> making new types of collections. There's this famous-ish saying that >>>>> Clojure holds to pretty well: >>>>> >>>>> "It is better to have 100 functions operate on one data structure than >>>>> 10 functions on 10 data structures." >>>>> - Alan Perlis >>>>> >>>>> Most functions in the Clojure world operate on a handful of basic data >>>>> types and structures. This makes it really easy to chain and combine >>>>> functions to slice and dice data since you don't need to convert between >>>>> types. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think I've ever made a special collection type in Clojure, >>>>> it's not all that common. So I'd suggest that while you're at this point >>>>> in >>>>> your journey you try to stick to the built-in Clojure collection types and >>>>> use the built-in functions to operate on them. >>>>> >>>>> To give you a little direction, instead of a Person object you could >>>>> make a hashmap like {:first-name "Jack" :last-name "Park"} and pass >>>>> that around. And then you can make a function that operates on that. >>>>> >>>>> (defn full-name >>>>> [person] >>>>> (str (get person :first-name) " " (get person :last-name))) >>>>> >>>>> And then you could expand that to maybe {:first-name "Jack" >>>>> :last-name "Park" :people-talked-to-on-mailing-list ["Cora Sutton"]} and >>>>> then operate on a collection of people like: >>>>> >>>>> (defn people-talked-to-on-mailing-list >>>>> [person all-people] >>>>> (let [people-to-find (set (get person >>>>> :people-talked-to-on-mailing-list))] >>>>> (filter (fn [p] >>>>> (people-to-find (full-name p)) >>>>> all-people)) >>>>> >>>>> (people-talked-to-on-mailing-list jack all-people) >>>>> ;; => {:first-name "Cora" :last-name "Sutton" >>>>> :people-talked-to-on-mailing-list ["Jack Park"]} >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 11:23 AM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jack! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I could be wrong but I think this could just be: (every? eval >>>>>>> members) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I see a few things here that seem strange to me so I wanted to share >>>>>>> a few points that might be helpful (or might not, let me know either >>>>>>> way) >>>>>>> for future code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * So typically you don't want to def or defn within another function >>>>>>> call since that will define a new value at the top level. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (defn foo [] >>>>>>> (def bar 1) >>>>>>> (println (inc bar)) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (foo) >>>>>>> ;; ^^ calling foo will define bar at the top level >>>>>>> >>>>>>> bar >>>>>>> ;; => 1 >>>>>>> ;; whoops, didn't mean to have that at the top level like that >>>>>>> ;; imagine if two different threads called that in parallel >>>>>>> ::grimace:: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Instead, you usually want to use the let function: >>>>>>> https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/let >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So in your code you might use this something like: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (let [result (atom true)] >>>>>>> ....) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The error you're seeing is from the (defn result ...) in your code, >>>>>>> you're missing the argument vector [] after result -- so it would >>>>>>> look like (defn result [] (atom true)) -- but you really don't want >>>>>>> to defn like that, I think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * To update an atom's value you don't want to assign like that, you >>>>>>> want to use swap! https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/swap! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (swap! f >>>>>>> (fn [cur-val new-val] (and cur-val new-val)) >>>>>>> (eval member)) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * You probably don't want to use an atom here. Atoms are usually for >>>>>>> data that you intend to have multiple threads accessing. In this case >>>>>>> it's >>>>>>> just a value that changes during a single thread's execution here. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How else could you solve this if not for the very convenient every? >>>>>>> function? There are a bunch of ways! Here are a few, with things written >>>>>>> out pretty explicitly so they're more clear. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> loop/recur: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (loop [result true >>>>>>> remaining-members members] >>>>>>> (let [member (first remaining-members) >>>>>>> remaining-members (rest members) >>>>>>> new-result (eval member)] >>>>>>> (if new-result >>>>>>> (recur true remaining-members) >>>>>>> false))) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> reduce v1: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (reduce (fn [result member] >>>>>>> (and result >>>>>>> (eval member))) >>>>>>> true >>>>>>> members) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> reduce v2.0, that will now stop iterating once one of the members >>>>>>> evals to false: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (reduce (fn [_ member] >>>>>>> (or (eval member) >>>>>>> (reduced false))) >>>>>>> true >>>>>>> members) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My point with sharing these is that in clojure usually the best way >>>>>>> to solve these problems is to pass new values to the next iteration >>>>>>> while >>>>>>> accumulating a result instead of changing a variable on each iteration. >>>>>>> Or >>>>>>> to use one of these sweet built-in functions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does that make sense? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * I thiiiiiiink you might not mean eval but I'm interested in what >>>>>>> kind of problem you're solving! :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hope that helps! >>>>>>> Cora >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 12:41 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have a class which treats a sequence as a conjunctive list of >>>>>>>> objects which, when evaluated, return a boolean. It is an attempt to >>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>> doseq to walk along that list, evaluating each entry, and anding that >>>>>>>> result with boolean atom. It fails. A sketch of the code is this - >>>>>>>> taken >>>>>>>> from the error message: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> inside (defn AndList... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (reify >>>>>>>> ie4clj.api.Inferrable >>>>>>>> (defn evalMembers >>>>>>>> [members] >>>>>>>> (defn result (atom true)) >>>>>>>> (doseq [x members] >>>>>>>> (result = (and result (eval x)))) >>>>>>>> (println (clojure.core/deref result)) >>>>>>>> (result))) - *failed: vector? at: [:fn-tail :arity-1 :params] >>>>>>>> spec: :clojure.core.specs.alpha/param-list* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It could be that my Java background is clouding my use of clojure. >>>>>>>> Any comments will be appreciated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> Jack >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient >>>>>>>> with your first post. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient >>>>>>> with your first post. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient >>>>>> with your first post. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 6:21 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> (every? eval members) does not appear to work on a list of functions >>>>>> designed to evaluate to a boolean. >>>>>> >>>>>> That code is used in a function evaluateAnd >>>>>> >>>>>> Two simple tests >>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true true] --> true >>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true false] --> nil (why not "false" as the every? >>>>>> examples show?) >>>>>> >>>>>> The specific code for building the list of functions is this >>>>>> >>>>>> (def x (atom [])) >>>>>> (let [result (list (ref SimpleTrue) (ref SimpleFalse))] >>>>>> (println "BAL1" result ) >>>>>> (reset! x result) >>>>>> ) >>>>>> (println "BAL2" @x ) >>>>>> >>>>>> (@x) <<<< returns the atom's value >>>>>> >>>>>> And the final println is this >>>>>> >>>>>> BAL2 (#object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x335b5620 {:status :ready, :val >>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue 0x6eb2384f >>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue@6eb2384f]}] >>>>>> #object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x3c9c0d96 {:status :ready, :val >>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse 0x31dadd46 >>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse@31dadd46]}]) >>>>>> >>>>>> evaluateAnd never saw the result, with this error message >>>>>> >>>>>> clojure.lang.PersistentList cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn >>>>>> >>>>>> The test which fails is this >>>>>> >>>>>> (def result (evaluateAnd (buildAndList) )) <<< fails here >>>>>> (println "bar" result) >>>>>> (result) >>>>>> >>>>>> The googleverse seems to agree that there are extra parens around the >>>>>> value. Google isn't giving me an obvious way to take that value outside >>>>>> of >>>>>> its surrounding parens (bal2 above). >>>>>> Still looking, and hoping that solves the problem. >>>>>> Maybe there's a way to go back to buildAndList and not return the >>>>>> value with parens. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 11:23 AM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jack! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I could be wrong but I think this could just be: (every? eval >>>>>>> members) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I see a few things here that seem strange to me so I wanted to share >>>>>>> a few points that might be helpful (or might not, let me know either >>>>>>> way) >>>>>>> for future code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * So typically you don't want to def or defn within another function >>>>>>> call since that will define a new value at the top level. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (defn foo [] >>>>>>> (def bar 1) >>>>>>> (println (inc bar)) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (foo) >>>>>>> ;; ^^ calling foo will define bar at the top level >>>>>>> >>>>>>> bar >>>>>>> ;; => 1 >>>>>>> ;; whoops, didn't mean to have that at the top level like that >>>>>>> ;; imagine if two different threads called that in parallel >>>>>>> ::grimace:: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Instead, you usually want to use the let function: >>>>>>> https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/let >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So in your code you might use this something like: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (let [result (atom true)] >>>>>>> ....) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The error you're seeing is from the (defn result ...) in your code, >>>>>>> you're missing the argument vector [] after result -- so it would >>>>>>> look like (defn result [] (atom true)) -- but you really don't want >>>>>>> to defn like that, I think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * To update an atom's value you don't want to assign like that, you >>>>>>> want to use swap! https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/swap! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (swap! f >>>>>>> (fn [cur-val new-val] (and cur-val new-val)) >>>>>>> (eval member)) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * You probably don't want to use an atom here. Atoms are usually for >>>>>>> data that you intend to have multiple threads accessing. In this case >>>>>>> it's >>>>>>> just a value that changes during a single thread's execution here. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How else could you solve this if not for the very convenient every? >>>>>>> function? There are a bunch of ways! Here are a few, with things written >>>>>>> out pretty explicitly so they're more clear. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> loop/recur: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (loop [result true >>>>>>> remaining-members members] >>>>>>> (let [member (first remaining-members) >>>>>>> remaining-members (rest members) >>>>>>> new-result (eval member)] >>>>>>> (if new-result >>>>>>> (recur true remaining-members) >>>>>>> false))) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> reduce v1: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (reduce (fn [result member] >>>>>>> (and result >>>>>>> (eval member))) >>>>>>> true >>>>>>> members) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> reduce v2.0, that will now stop iterating once one of the members >>>>>>> evals to false: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (reduce (fn [_ member] >>>>>>> (or (eval member) >>>>>>> (reduced false))) >>>>>>> true >>>>>>> members) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My point with sharing these is that in clojure usually the best way >>>>>>> to solve these problems is to pass new values to the next iteration >>>>>>> while >>>>>>> accumulating a result instead of changing a variable on each iteration. >>>>>>> Or >>>>>>> to use one of these sweet built-in functions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does that make sense? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * I thiiiiiiink you might not mean eval but I'm interested in what >>>>>>> kind of problem you're solving! :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hope that helps! >>>>>>> Cora >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 12:41 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have a class which treats a sequence as a conjunctive list of >>>>>>>> objects which, when evaluated, return a boolean. It is an attempt to >>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>> doseq to walk along that list, evaluating each entry, and anding that >>>>>>>> result with boolean atom. It fails. A sketch of the code is this - >>>>>>>> taken >>>>>>>> from the error message: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> inside (defn AndList... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (reify >>>>>>>> ie4clj.api.Inferrable >>>>>>>> (defn evalMembers >>>>>>>> [members] >>>>>>>> (defn result (atom true)) >>>>>>>> (doseq [x members] >>>>>>>> (result = (and result (eval x)))) >>>>>>>> (println (clojure.core/deref result)) >>>>>>>> (result))) - *failed: vector? at: [:fn-tail :arity-1 :params] >>>>>>>> spec: :clojure.core.specs.alpha/param-list* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It could be that my Java background is clouding my use of clojure. >>>>>>>> Any comments will be appreciated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> Jack >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient >>>>>>>> with your first post. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient >>>>>>> with your first post. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient >>>>>> with your first post. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient >>>>> with your first post. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY1wvo_N32dKV1g-9cZAmTbZUO5bRAXDGkdHm-7_VD_-Rg%40mail.gmail.com >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY1wvo_N32dKV1g-9cZAmTbZUO5bRAXDGkdHm-7_VD_-Rg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>>> your first post. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fyc%2BctV%2B1OgzWRYLsWevL97ouVkS1FGf0uGFtTcznRjUg%40mail.gmail.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fyc%2BctV%2B1OgzWRYLsWevL97ouVkS1FGf0uGFtTcznRjUg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY0qvUUrTmQtfcUocwWbr50juXzoZt%3DSmPr%3D0o%3DgRXoM2A%40mail.gmail.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY0qvUUrTmQtfcUocwWbr50juXzoZt%3DSmPr%3D0o%3DgRXoM2A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fxJXPC8Y%3DY_UEAsAyMek4FZwo%2BP9bVahzrVKQLKGd%3D3Lg%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fxJXPC8Y%3DY_UEAsAyMek4FZwo%2BP9bVahzrVKQLKGd%3D3Lg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BKpWAu6%3D%2BEC6o3PSGg7CXETgyZymOBKLnhEJYG7UVdQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BKpWAu6%3D%2BEC6o3PSGg7CXETgyZymOBKLnhEJYG7UVdQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fz-Y9c9asSx85jrvrHvjLdX2qgLgjt8yPdxpHu_4X_vGg%40mail.gmail.com.
