Yes, I meant that :-)
But I agree that some more sugar in general in map destructuring could
help (and be more DRY).
e.g.
(defn g [a b & {:keys [[c 1] [d 2]]}] [a b c d])
or
(defn g [a b & {c [:c 1] d [:d 2]]}] [a b c d])
in the general case
2010/4/8 Chris Perkins <chrisperkin...@gmail.com>:
> On Apr 7, 5:41 am, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think defnk is deprecated by the new feature mentioned by Stuart.
>
> Do you mean to say that this:
>
> user=> (defnk f [a b :c 1 :d 2] [a b c d])
> #'user/f
> user=> (f 3 4 :d 7)
> [3 4 1 7]
>
> is deprecated in favor of this:
>
> user=> (defn g [a b & {:keys [c d] :or {c 1 d 2}}] [a b c d])
> #'user/g
> user=> (g 3 4 :d 7)
> [3 4 1 7]
>
> Eeek, I certainly hope not.
>
> - Chris Perkins
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
