On Apr 8, 11:08 am, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > In my own code I only avoid the convenience of destructuring in the > rare tight loops such as calculations intended to drive animations.
But when you write a function you would have to decide positional vs. keyword. Would you then take a guess about usage in tight loops vs. not? > I've found it to have little effect elsewhere on program performance. I suspect you are right. Anyway, I'm very glad to see the style supported, and hope the cleaner defnk version wins, with some ability to further destructure the keyworded arguments. (defnk f [a b :c 1 :d 2] [a b c d]) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
