Experiment results :
I switched a program to num.
It was quite straightforward.
First I had to replace a few unchecked-add by +.
Has unchecked-add changed name? (I use it for indices when itering on a java
array, if there is an overflow, you will know it beforehand)
The only funny event is that it was much much much slower at first.
Mainly doing reflection stuff.
I used *warn-on-reflection* and found:
( < val 0) where val is a double. Ugly, bad and wrong. I am not proud.
(* some-int some-double), that I changed to (* (double some-int)
some-double)
Then, I had some results on the benchmark I use to test my change. (I remove
14 seconds to each, because it is the compilation time. As this program is
made to run for a long time and I want to test the stationary speed,I put a
very low threshold for the jit. I don't know if it is a good idea or not.)
Initial program : 92 seconds - 14 = 78s
Corrected program with master : 86 seconds - 14 = 72s
Corrected program with num : 80 seconds - 14 = 66s
Note that it is quite heavy on the GC, so there is 5s gc in that, which
increase still more the difference.
Altogether, it is around 10% faster, without touching any annotation and
static function.
Moreover, it might be difficult to believe if you read the beginning of my
mail, but I spend a lot of time adding annotations where I thought it was
useful.
That's difficult, and still there is a nice speedup.
Most of all, I could start added annotations to function. The problem is I
use a lot of protocols.
Are there plans for support of prim in protocols?
Last thing, there is no single bottleneck that I could rewrite easily. This
10% is spread over the program.
Result of profiling:
Interpreted + native Method
0.2% 2 + 10 clojure.core__init.load
0.1% 8 + 0 distribution.FastProductWithinComp.non_local_draw
0.1% 7 + 0 clojure.core$vector.invoke
0.1% 7 + 0 java.util.WeakHashMap.get
...
2.8% 177 + 32 Total interpreted (including elided)
Compiled + native Method
2.4% 183 + 0 clojure.lang.RT.seqFrom
2.2% 164 + 1 distribution.FastProductWithinComp.non_local_draw
1.9% 61 + 81 java.util.WeakHashMap.getTable
1.4% 103 + 0 clojure.lang.RestFn.invoke
0.8% 62 + 1 clojure.core.protocols$fn__5284.invoke
0.7% 51 + 0 clojure.lang.RT.next
0.4% 31 + 1 clojure.lang.Var.pushThreadBindings
....
14.8% 1019 + 100 Total compiled (including elided)
Stub + native Method
81.3% 0 + 6154 java.lang.Object.hashCode
And yes, this 10% are obtained in a code that mainly use HashMaps to
retrieve already computed values (81.3% seems spent there).
So I would expect far better speed-up in a more typical program.
(Game : guess what the program does from its profile...)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
