On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Brian Carper <briancar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It looks quite good.  Maybe some mention of `lein clean` is
> warranted.  It would preclude a lot of the "Hey I just upgraded
> library X and now everything is broken" kinds of questions I see on
> various mailing lists.

Definitely.

> The part discussing the group-id/artifact-id etc. is great for those
> of us who don't know maven.  Can you consider adding something about
> how to name a project in project.clj so that it can be pushed to
> clojars cleanly?  On clojars you see projects named with a bare word,
> like "compojure" and "swank-clojure", and then others with a one-word
> group-id, "foo/bar", then others with a full domain,
> "org.clojars.someguy/baz".  This is a bit of a mess.

There's some mention of this in the readme, but I will expand it and
move it to the tutorial. It is important that people understand when
org.clojars.$USERNAME is appropriate since otherwise they will squat
on group-ids that belong to someone else.

-Phil

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to