On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Pointing out try-clojure.org would probably be a good thing there >> (although that site is currently down) > > Terrible idea, unless that site is going to become a *lot* more > reliable in the very near future and then stay that way.
I agree with your comments that pointing to a broken site is not good - so what will it take to get try-clojure.org up and running and reliable? Is it a code problem? A hosting problem? Care and feeding? I think try-clojure.org is a great idea and if it's a hosting problem, well, let me try running it on the EdgeWeb server I have that currently only hosts my blog and we'll see if it can be made more stable...? -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
