It is a hosting problem. Heinz (Licenser) currently hosts the domain and the site as well. It is not really under my control. I had no idea that the site was down. I think emailing me or telling me on IRC or twitter or one of the other easily found and plentiful ways to get a hold of me is much better than complaining about it as if it were something that is impossible to fix. Furthermore, Heinz has it set up so that the site, if it goes down, is supposed to restart, so this actually surprises me.
I'll talk to Heinz and sort this out. It isn't actually a problem to just host the site myself. I'll see if he can point the domain at my server, and then it will be my fault when it goes down and it'll be easier for me to fix it. On Mar 29, 8:27 pm, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Devin Walters <dev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > TryClojure is an opportunity, not a liability. Treat it as such. > > Oh, I agree that it is an opportunity, but in its present yo-yo state > it will reflect poorly on the main site and have unintended > consequences. I wholeheartedly support the idea of making it much more > reliable and then linking it from the main site. Just not pointing > newbs straight there if it *won't* become reliable. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
