Dare I mention the idea of an official (or semi-official) Clojure documentation project that ties together the disparate sources that currently exist? What say you, community?
There is a lot of information out there that simply needs to be placed in the right bucket in order for it to be useful to the community at large. @Stuart H., I hope I'm not hijacking, but I guess I see this thread as an opportunity to try and bring together a team of people willing to devote some time to improving the current state of documentation on-whole. If anyone is interested in building a team to work on consistently improving Clojure in this area, contact me via the result your receive from your repl: (apply str (reverse "moc.liamg@wnived")) I have a feeling we could make a positive, sizable dent by teaming up on any one of the concerns posed in this thread to-date. Regards, -- Devin Walters On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Nick Zbinden wrote: > One more thing people should do is update there blogs. I know its > stupid work but I should be done. Its extremly confusing when google > for something. > > Update your blog with a little notice or update it that it is correct > again. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
