My understanding is that it's mostly a hosting problem. I'll ask
Raynes about it - the code is mostly his, as I understand it.

On Mar 29, 5:08 pm, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Pointing out try-clojure.org would probably be a good thing there
> >> (although that site is currently down)
>
> > Terrible idea, unless that site is going to become a *lot* more
> > reliable in the very near future and then stay that way.
>
> I agree with your comments that pointing to a broken site is not good
> - so what will it take to get try-clojure.org up and running and
> reliable? Is it a code problem? A hosting problem? Care and feeding?
>
> I think try-clojure.org is a great idea and if it's a hosting problem,
> well, let me try running it on the EdgeWeb server I have that
> currently only hosts my blog and we'll see if it can be made more
> stable...?
> --
> Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
> An Architect's View --http://corfield.org/
> World Singles, LLC. --http://worldsingles.com/
> Railo Technologies, Inc. --http://www.getrailo.com/
>
> "Perfection is the enemy of the good."
> -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to