This discussion is getting a lot of "What are you talking about? Leiningen is what you're looking for!" replies. I know. I'm a happy lein user, and use it and clojars frequently with some of my larger projects. I'm very grateful for the work Phil and the other contributors<https://www.ohloh.net/p/leiningen/contributors>did. It helped me tremendously. There's no need to get defensive. As I tried to emphasize several times in my post, this was not an attack on lein or other build tools - they certainly have their place in the development process. I was trying to get a discussion going on the current library situation, which I think if everyone took back a step they'd agree is far from ideal. Lein is a remedy, but not a solution. Is lein as good as it gets?
Instead of iterating what's available today and how much better it makes things (I know), I hope we can question our assumptions about how things are and get a discussion going on how to make things better. If not for simplicity, do it for the new users who today when visiting the Getting Started pages are overwhelmed by rampant choice and endless technical procedures. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
