On May 16, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Mars0i <marsh...@logical.net> wrote: > Sometimes I write a function that will work in the intended way only with > collections that are not maps. (For example, suppose I write a function > that's supposed to operate on vectors, lists, sets, or lazy sequences of > keywords, what do I call its argument? "keyw-coll" is too broad, and > "keyw-seq" is too narrow.)
I think I'd use "kws" or "keywords" in that case. I'd expect a seq of keywords. I don't think keyw-seq is too narrow though. The items in a seq on a map are "map entries" or more generically "pairs", not "keywords". --Steve -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
