It's clear that the answer to my question is: No. There is no common term for non-map collections.
Btw, the way that I expressed the question has been misleading. I'm not really interested in a function that is supposed to accept only collections of keywords. I defined a function, which in my application will operate on collections of keywords, as it happens--in particular, keywords that represent things called "persons" in the application. In the application, the argument will always be a vector of person-ids, so I could call it "person-vec-to-foo". On the other hand, since what the function performs is a general-purpose operation that could be used for any group of objects, I wanted to call it and its parameter something more general. But it would be bizarre to pass maps to the function (unless someone wanted to perform operations on MapEntrys) so "collection" seemed like the wrong term. I could give more details or post the code, but I think the answer is clear. Thank you to all who answered! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
