On Friday, May 16, 2014 12:09:36 PM UTC-5, squeegee wrote: > > I think I’d use “kws” or “keywords” in that case. I’d expect a seq of > keywords. > > I don’t think keyw-seq is too narrow though. The items in a seq on a map > are “map entries" or more generically “pairs”, not “keywords”. >
OK, but "seq" implies that sets aren't appropriate, but as long as I don't care about order, they may be perfectly fine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
