-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 October 2002 12:36, Ian Bruseker wrote:
> in the To: line of any reply. That doesn't seem to be what you want, so I
> suggest you unset Reply-to, since you don't actually need it to be set.
already have...
> (Don't blame Outlook, by the way, it's only doing its job - two reply-to
> headers, two To: addresses. If you want to blame the user for not
> explicitly deleting your personal email address from every reply they want
> to send to the list, go ahead, but they shouldn't have to do it in the
> first place.)
what about the case where there is an actual need for a Reply-to: header? i'd
posit that outlook (among others) is indeed broken here. especially since
other mailers manage to get it right.
> Personally, I don't care which way it's set. Sometimes I take the time to
> delete the extra addresses, sometimes I don't, but if you get two replies
> from me, you have no one to blame but yourself and the list admin. ;-)
i could also blame the software you use that isn't smart enough to figure out
that this is an email list (the headers state as much) and should therefore
use the list address Reply-to: unless specifically told otherwise.
you could even fix it if you had the source. <grin>
- --
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler"
- Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9odd51rcusafx20MRArVFAKCHQb7DweQhM2JIHcf0s2sJn5+07wCgpDTx
Gsubs3YuSvSpR3R0LXwdZb4=
=9WTb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
