Just to correct you, Ian.  I'm not getting two replies, like Aaron. 
Just the one, thank you very much.  My reply-to address is different 
than my proper email address because I use an alias for my everyday 
email address.  That way, if I ever change ISP's, I only have to change 
the alias' redirection.

As to Aarons' situation, I'm probably off the mark there, as I was only 
thinking aloud that you might have been hitting the reply to all button 
instead of the normal "reply" button.  My apologies, mea culpa, etc.

Ian Bruseker wrote:
> Absolutely positive.  I do know how to work a mouse.  ;-)
> 
> Huh, well, I was mistaken about one thing.  Aaron isn't the only one on the
> list who gets two replies - you do too.
> 
> Let me hypothesize: Both of you have explicitly set Reply To in your email
> program settings.  Am I correct?  Check the email headers.  All the answers
> are there.  There are 2 Reply-To entries in the headers of each email you
> guys send out, one generated by your MUA, one generated by the mailing list
> software.  Reply-to is only really intended for use when you send from one
> email address, but expect the reply to go to a different address.  Since
> both of you seem to send and receive from the same address, you don't
> actually need to set that.  Furthermore, the CLUG mailing list software
> (more specifically, the list admin, whoever you are, has set it up this way)
> does the extra magic of adding a reply-to entry for the list as the email
> passes through (this is known as "Reply-to Munging", see link below), to
> make sure conversations stay on the list, where one expects them to be.  It
> does not, however, remove any existing reply-to entries, as a courtesy to
> the sender, to respect their settings.  Since you guys have explicitly set
> it, there are two reply-to's, so Outlook is putting both those address in
> the To: line of any reply.  That doesn't seem to be what you want, so I
> suggest you unset Reply-to, since you don't actually need it to be set.
> 
> (Don't blame Outlook, by the way, it's only doing its job - two reply-to
> headers, two To: addresses.  If you want to blame the user for not
> explicitly deleting your personal email address from every reply they want
> to send to the list, go ahead, but they shouldn't have to do it in the first
> place.)
> 
> Note that if the mailing list software did not set reply-to, and since you
> guys explicitly do set reply-to, then every reply to you would instantly go
> off-list.
> 
> For the definitive argument for why reply-to munging is a bad thing, read
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html  But if you agree with the
> positions stated in that document, take it up with the list admin, not with
> the list users.
> 
> Personally, I don't care which way it's set.  Sometimes I take the time to
> delete the extra addresses, sometimes I don't, but if you get two replies
> from me, you have no one to blame but yourself and the list admin.  ;-)
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: David J. Bourassa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:00 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: (clug-talk) some quick notes
>>
>>
>>I don't know Ian.  Are you sure you're not hitting the "Reply to All
>>button" ?  Mine doesn't work that way (Mozilla).
>>
>>Ian Bruseker wrote:
>>
>>>Aaron,
>>>
>>>Take a look at the "To:" line.  Notice it has both the clug
>>>email and your
>>>email address?  I hit "Reply", and that's what I got as reply to email
>>>addresses.  No other person on this list has that issue.  I think the
>>>problem is at your end.  Check your email program settings, the issue is
>>>probably there.
>>>
>>>Ian
>>
>>--
>>   ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>                     Dave Bourassa at
>>         http://members.shaw.ca/djb.enterprises/
>>                 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>   ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 



-- 
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Dave Bourassa at
         http://members.shaw.ca/djb.enterprises/
                 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to