-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 05 December 2002 01:24, Jarrod Major wrote:
> This why I suggested co-location. This is
> a ways off though, as CLUG doesn't really have the funds to do this
> long-term. Hence my idea of trying to be the beneficiary of someone's
> charity.
>
> With co-location, it's our box.
network connectivity would be easy to find and could probably be had for free.
getting a box for CLUG (that CLUG owned) would be a bit harder, most likely.
perhaps this is a good use of membership proceeds and should be brought up at
the next Annual General Meeting. Jeff's been doing a GREAT job ensuring we
have server resources, but it does put quite a bit of onus on him.
- --
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler"
- Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE98ODN1rcusafx20MRAtWlAJ46a99OVUbKl9ScP+l2nhIW6ShTSACffx8O
pDh2kVdq9xWQ465oEeAyeb0=
=/0zZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
