Shell accounts wouldn't be too bad to admin in a jail.  We could also provide 
email address to users.  And finally settle an unamed debate by offering both 
an rfc2821 and an rfc2616 compliant �thing�...rfc977 would be nice too.  I 
can help setup this stuff.


Le 10 D�cembre 2002 10:18, vous avez �crit :
> On Monday 09 December 2002 09:20, Johnny Stork wrote:
> > Sounds good. If I came up with a server do you have the means to
> > host/park it somewhere? Just put together a list of suggested
> > gear/configurations and I will work on it as soon as the cash flow picks
> > up.
>
> wow.
>
> that's all i can say. wow. and thanks =)
>
> ok, we'll come up with some basic specs, though i know it won't be too much
> since our needs are extremely minimal.
>
> as for parking it: that won't be a problem. there are several options at my
> disposal, and i'm just one person in the group. =)
>
> On Monday 09 December 2002 09:33, Chris Wallace wrote:
> > To that end...
> >
> > I recently "stumbled upon" (read: work was tossing out) an "old" Compaq
> > Proliant dual Ppro 200 server.
> >
> > Would CLUG be interested in something like this or should I just leave
> > it there or donate it to CRS or something?
>
> this would actually probably do quite well as a CLUG web/mail server.
>
> which actually brings up something i've been thinking about for a while: if
> CLUG actually had hardware resources it would be very cool to do one or
> more of the following:
>
>  o host a devel box (CVS, bug tracking, etc) for people engaged in local
> linux/free software development. GForge is looking quite cool (I'm going to
> be implementing it at a place I contract as a project consultant in
> January!)
>
>  o a shell box that CLUG members can get access to. yes, i know shell boes
> are an admin nightmare and can cause lots of problems, but they have and do
> exist. it would be a great way, IMHO, to provide a way/place for people to
> learn more about Linux without having it on a system locally, as well as to
> provide another service to members.
>
> thoughts?

Reply via email to