-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 IMHO at least all lightly or what's the point?
On Tuesday January 21 2003 06:18 pm, you wrote: > I can take Samba, at some point if people are interested. It'll have to be > May or later though. > > Also, Samba is a big topic. Let me know what you want to know... (Do I > cover Linux groups, and User permissions? How in-depth? or do I just focus > on Samba (smb.conf)? Log Files? On the Domain side, how much Windows > networking should be in there? (1 domain, or multiple?) PDC or Client?) > > I've got a few Samba boxes running, but really, I'd guess I'm backwards for > most people. I have Windows Clients connecting to Samba PDCs. I could > probably wing a Samba desktop to Windows PDC session though. > > Kev. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jarrod Major" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:27 PM > Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Technology Presentations > > > Absolutely Mahlah. > > > > I think something like SAMBA could stand to go around again. I know there > > are folks dying to hear more about Apache. Just to name a few... > > > > BTW, I will wait to hear back from Brian, Rob and anyone else before I > > commit Shawn and I to doing the IPCop/IPChains/IPTables presentation. > > > > Jarrod > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Mahlah Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:39 PM > > Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Technology Presentations > > > > > I just thought I would point out.. that even if topics have been > > > touched > > > > in > > > > > the past.. it would be more then fine to do the same topic again.. > > > > whether > > > > > you would like to add information to a past presentation.. or have > > learnt > > > > more about the topic since your presentation, and/or someone else's > > > presentation.. > > > > > > Our group is growing.. and I'm sure there would be people interested in > > > > past > > > > > topics who couldn't attend at the time.. and/or were not apart of the > > > > group > > > > > at the time. > > > > > > Just thought I would throw that in there.. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Mahlah Hansen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE+LeXaJ053raI+x/sRAlzmAKCU/OXu4Ux/Yv1dnmKqcpiQFRT2+gCdEsDa /raD3D8vJgdzgqcT2jmcE9s= =6qZb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
public_key.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
