Hi Kevin;
Your final guess is correct as far as I,m concerned. This is exactly what I
want to do with my Linux box and my wifes windoze box.
Regards
Mel Broadhurst
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Technology Presentations


> > IMHO at least all lightly or what's the point?
>
>
>
> The prezzy should on be about 90 Mins, shouldn't it be?  Some things will
> need to be dropped.
>
> Lets say I wanted to demo Printing from a Windows desktop through a Linux
> server.
>
> We take a preconfigured Windows box.
> We take a Linux box, add CUPS, configure CUPS, create a printer, perhaps
> install foo-matic drivers and/or ghostscript, then go to smb.conf, and set
> it up to print with CUPS (it probably is, but we'd want to discuss what is
> needed, and why).  go back to the Windows box, and map to the printer.
Add
> in any sort of "uniqueness" (new Cups printers don't show up unless Samba
> re-reads smb.conf) that should be discussed.  Print a test page.  Time's
up.
> More or less.  Cups is one method of printing.  There are several.  If I'm
> the only one using cups, I've wasted everyone's time.
>
> Samba is a big topic, because it ties to/depends on so many things.  If I
> was going to do a discussion, I'd rather go a bit deeper on topics that
> people need help with than spend them on things that nobody cares about.
>
> Do people care about using smbclient and/or smbstatus?  mount -t smbfs?
>
> Should I talk about the difference between SMB and NMB?
>
> The line dividing where samba ends, and something else (Microsoft
> networking, Linux security, Samba security, Printing, Domain Controller,
> etc.)  And that's intentionally ignoring winbind & PAM.  It's
intentionally
> ignoring maintaining Samba across VPNs or other routed networks.  (WINS
> servers).
>
> Given my own guess, most people want to be able to connect a single Linux
> desktop to a (spouses) Windows desktop and share files & printers in
either
> direction.  Mostly I'm looking for confirmation that that is an accurate
> guess.  I believe it was Jarrod that was trying to set up a situation like
> that most reciently on the list.  I suspect he isn't alone.
>
> Kev.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to