I think there is maybe one format we can all agree on...? format c:\
:-D Curtis. -----Original Message----- From: Cameron Nikitiuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: (clug-talk) Suggestion/Question I have always tried to do that in all my messages. As a matter of fact I think I was the one who first suggested it...or something like it. Topic - Specific Question/Comment But...because we are growing so fast, it is hard to make sure that everyone follows the same format. Besides...you will always have people that want to be wankers for the sake of being wankers...and won't follow that format. "The debate continues..." Cameron -----Original Message----- From: Jarrod Major [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 21, 2003 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Suggestion/Question -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey All, I cast my vote with Jesse, Dave, Mike and Mahlah for the same reasons they have listed. Again, well said Jesse and Mahlah. Jeff has been more than gracious and is a huge asset to CLUG. I will give you all an excerpt off the mailing list webpage as a suggestion to handle this. Make your subject line reflect what you are concerned about. AFAIK you can put a long string into your subject line so why not. The format would be something like: (for-sale) Some computer stuff (programming) some C questions (events) InstallFest We have the guidelines there people, however, we seem to have a hard time getting people to use them. I am as bad an offender as anyone else. How about we try to do this and suggest the guidelines to new people coming on the list? Sound like a plan? - -- Jarrod GPG Fingerprint: FA4A 1EA3 A0EE A842 07BB 804C 0090 14F6 BE6E DE3D CLUG Treasurer Registered Linux User: #224211 On Tue January 21 2003 8:10 am, you wrote: > I have the same vote, although I don't always understand the technical or > programming questions that are sometimes posted, at that time, I find as > I'm learning I can look back, and go over the messages to find information > that I need. What i'm not interested in today, maybe essential tommorrow. I > can work with filters to move different topics into different folders > easily enough, without the extra hassle for Jeff. Well said Jesse! > > > Dave Bourassa wrote: > > I vote along with Jesse. He says it all. > > > > > Jesse Kline wrote: > > > I'll place my vote for leaving things the way they are. I like only > > > having to subscribe to one list. Sure not all of the topics interest > > > me, but I read them anyway in the hopes of gaining new knowledge. I > > > would hate to see useful info. pass us by just because we are not > > > subscribed to a certain CLUG list. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBPi11LgCQFPa+bt49AQI/KgQAkcd94gW3O7B2iWGZR6eSImQqoR4/AK/R ePjkdvz9SiH/km3cxjEtgp2AbUKRR7FJj9HAMnPAV44zBqN1LiyY6wCCUWU8JXcC kyt7M25J9HmwoDABe6zmpECxIApYqWSQ7RH6jGKWAnDbr7QqnVkswCaJG6oG8YfO /BT3wtPNZNE= =8FYp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
