Lets not forget cross postings...  I hate when one message is sent to every
every group because the person doesn't "know" where to post it, or just
wants to make sure it's answered.

Kev.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Bourassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:27 AM
Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Suggestion/Question


> I vote along with Jesse.  He says it all.
>
> Jesse Kline wrote:
> > I'll place my vote for leaving things the way they are. I like only
> > having to subscribe to one list. Sure not all of the topics interest me,
> > but I read them anyway in the hopes of gaining new knowledge. I would
> > hate to see useful info. pass us by just because we are not subscribed
> > to a certain CLUG list. Also, say for example I don't like coding, but
> > in a coding question I have an answer to a certain problem. The person
> > asking that question would not be able to gain the knowledge that I have
> > just because he posted it to the wrong list. If he were to post it to
> > two lists then those of us subscribed to both lists would be getting
> > duplicates of the same message. I know the group is growing, but I don't
> > think we should start fractioning off the group quite yet. Part of the
> > reason why we have been able to accomplish some great stuff like trying
> > to become a society, having a great booth at convergence, etc. Is
> > because the group has come together recently to make the things happen.
> > I think dividing us up would only set us back a couple of years.
> >
> > Jesse
> --
>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>                      Dave Bourassa at
>          http://members.shaw.ca/djb.enterprises/
>                  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>       "There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who
>            understand binary and those who don't."
>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to