-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 19 March 2003 9:51 am, you wrote:

Please take a look at he side-by-side comparison of the Bylaws now and see 
that notes have been added explaining the reasons for the edits. It is not 
complete as it is taking longer than anticipated.

I should have the rest of the notes up tomorrow night. Including the 
explanation below.

Thanks for your patience while we are working on this.

> Hey Szemir;
>
> Jarrod tells us (the rest of the Executive) that originally that statement
> was brought over from the CLUE Bylaws because they (the former Executive)
> believed that the clause was stating that CLUG would NOT be responsible for
> legal fees required to fight any legal battle targeted at an Executive
> Member or other member of CLUG.
>
> After further review it was decided that the clause ACTUALLY stated that
> CLUG WOULD be responsible for all legal costs of the Executive/Member that
> was being litigated.  As CLUG has barely enough money for a legal retainer
> right now and besides... CLUG has better things to spend its money on than
> lawyers <grin> the Executive decided that until legal clarification of this
> point could be made it would be best to remove it altogether.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> On Wednesday 19 March 2003 8:31 pm, you wrote:
> > Hi
> > I read the new once, and the part that goes like
> > <snip>
> > Indemnities to Executives and Others"
> >
> >  Every Executive or Officer of the Guild or other person who has
> > undertaken or is about to undertake any liability on behalf o
> > <snip>
> > seems to be missing in the new document . May i ask WHY?
> > Cheers
> > Szemir
> >
> > On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:34, you wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Hey All,
> > >
> > > Okay, I spent part of my lunch getting this cobbled together.
> > >
> > > You can view a side by side comparison of the submitted bylaws versus
> > > the new proposed Bylaws. Please forgive the layout it was done very
> > > quickly. I added links from each page to both the reveiwer's comments
> > > and the example bylaws PDF from the Alberta Government.
> > >
> > > I have yet to add a series of comments on what was moved where, why we
> > > changed this or that and why we removed a particular section. I'll have
> > > that up tonight.
> > >
> > > http://clug.digitaldemesne.net/
> > >
> > > Enjoy!
> > >
> > > - --
> > > Jarrod Major
> > > GPG Fingerprint: FA4A 1EA3 A0EE A842 07BB  804C 0090 14F6 BE6E DE3D
> > > Registered Linux User: #224211
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> > >
> > > iQCVAwUBPnjGMACQFPa+bt49AQLTDAP/dz8FGK2wW7rRoyZQBr7HPHarbqqBA+EO
> > > e1mkVGLpP0IQA5t0n0GoSBoRsqUaP4+dlmyjp/yTKnsv5LUEvvXMWu7RDYtItYgf
> > > QPDQVvup6xQeBlqsQgphTl/MyX+oOqMKzGypYpUVyPyzu56Ztz1cP3XE2XhrHEig
> > > 9SZiBxmzEiU=
> > > =DBaA
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

- -- 
Jarrod Major
GPG Fingerprint: FA4A 1EA3 A0EE A842 07BB  804C 0090 14F6 BE6E DE3D
Registered Linux User: #224211
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBPnlhmwCQFPa+bt49AQKBLAP+ItEdCKTk2QUagOAzRjanlGMHEJEuLGSv
FouFSgVUr7d8zKgOGx9M+IGJbsrahGSoOkTjWLFR6v6VIzL3luCp1VkiM1MhSQ4B
XeJcsMUq0AW3GKygjeblUken1NIWCGNHE6U984S4+3X0wWsrFuvTf2TS3EpYhU1t
d45tQhQ62gQ=
=QmZ5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to