-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 19 March 2003 11:37 pm, you wrote:
Hey All, The comments regarding the changes to the old Bylaws are now up in their entirety. We also tweaked some verbage in section 1.3 of the proposed Bylaws. Please review everything now at your leisure. Thanks! > On Wednesday 19 March 2003 9:51 am, you wrote: > > Please take a look at he side-by-side comparison of the Bylaws now and see > that notes have been added explaining the reasons for the edits. It is not > complete as it is taking longer than anticipated. > > I should have the rest of the notes up tomorrow night. Including the > explanation below. > > Thanks for your patience while we are working on this. > > > Hey Szemir; > > > > Jarrod tells us (the rest of the Executive) that originally that > > statement was brought over from the CLUE Bylaws because they (the former > > Executive) believed that the clause was stating that CLUG would NOT be > > responsible for legal fees required to fight any legal battle targeted at > > an Executive Member or other member of CLUG. > > > > After further review it was decided that the clause ACTUALLY stated that > > CLUG WOULD be responsible for all legal costs of the Executive/Member > > that was being litigated. As CLUG has barely enough money for a legal > > retainer right now and besides... CLUG has better things to spend its > > money on than lawyers <grin> the Executive decided that until legal > > clarification of this point could be made it would be best to remove it > > altogether. > > > > Hope that helps. > > > > On Wednesday 19 March 2003 8:31 pm, you wrote: > > > Hi > > > I read the new once, and the part that goes like > > > <snip> > > > Indemnities to Executives and Others" > > > > > > Every Executive or Officer of the Guild or other person who has > > > undertaken or is about to undertake any liability on behalf o > > > <snip> > > > seems to be missing in the new document . May i ask WHY? > > > Cheers > > > Szemir > > > > > > On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:34, you wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > Hey All, > > > > > > > > Okay, I spent part of my lunch getting this cobbled together. > > > > > > > > You can view a side by side comparison of the submitted bylaws versus > > > > the new proposed Bylaws. Please forgive the layout it was done very > > > > quickly. I added links from each page to both the reveiwer's comments > > > > and the example bylaws PDF from the Alberta Government. > > > > > > > > I have yet to add a series of comments on what was moved where, why > > > > we changed this or that and why we removed a particular section. I'll > > > > have that up tonight. > > > > > > > > http://clug.digitaldemesne.net/ > > > > > > > > Enjoy! > > > > > > > > - -- > > > > Jarrod Major > > > > GPG Fingerprint: FA4A 1EA3 A0EE A842 07BB 804C 0090 14F6 BE6E DE3D > > > > Registered Linux User: #224211 > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > > > > > > > iQCVAwUBPnjGMACQFPa+bt49AQLTDAP/dz8FGK2wW7rRoyZQBr7HPHarbqqBA+EO > > > > e1mkVGLpP0IQA5t0n0GoSBoRsqUaP4+dlmyjp/yTKnsv5LUEvvXMWu7RDYtItYgf > > > > QPDQVvup6xQeBlqsQgphTl/MyX+oOqMKzGypYpUVyPyzu56Ztz1cP3XE2XhrHEig > > > > 9SZiBxmzEiU= > > > > =DBaA > > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - -- Jarrod Major GPG Fingerprint: FA4A 1EA3 A0EE A842 07BB 804C 0090 14F6 BE6E DE3D Registered Linux User: #224211 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBPnqnEQCQFPa+bt49AQL1rwP/UoVa6T9VjwYoVlFP5DEm1a4bleuGyK3q IvHKOKL3jN/qqFFnmFnLM2Pm34c/So65vU8Aw4+3h0PHtf9p3a5TpnfQBRXt1vHS 51FOWvsi99+L3DvvR9JgZohFWbzFkgZPdF9Qm45zaQSkQtOYgokN4ElN9/dw8jMZ Wig68EFxokI= =kqZh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
