Definitely agree with this. Whether or not the resident was discharged
with/without return anticipated, his/her needs will need to be
addressed--previous assessments and histories are pertinent and aid in proper
current assessment and care planning.
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:36:19 -0500 "Orth, Ron A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Actually, the requirement for maintaining 15 months worth of MDS is not dependent on the discharge status. Any resident that has been in your faciltiy and returns, regardless of discharge status, should have 15 months worth, if applicable, maintained in the clinical record.For the two residents below, the 15-month policy does apply.Ron-----Original Message-----
From: M. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 8:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Readmission w/o expected returnI would not pull 15 months of MDS's forward. Both situations are discharges without expected returns. So if the residents return, they are considered a new admit and would start out with a new chart.As a side note - if the resident was noncompliant with your tx plan and left AMA, why'd you guys take him back?------------------------Mike
smo82 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Need an answer quick if you please. If a resident leaves AMA, and resident returned 10 days later, does the 15 months policy for copying the MDS apply? The other scenario, if the resident is discharged without expected return and is readmitted within a month does the 15 months MDS regulation apply. I read page 1-27 & 28 of the August 2003 revision but this scenario is not addressed. Thanks you your response
Susan
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
To admit you were wrong is to declare you are wiser now than before.
--Unknown
