Daniel,

The records show that the extension for 586 days has been issued on
01-16-2004.

niek

On 12 jan, 02:33, Daniel Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> Suzieq,
>
> That was my error! I had read about it being approved on another website. The 
> application for extension from May 28, 2013 for 586 days to January 4, 2015 
> has not been approved yet. However, it is still listed as in process. Sprycel 
> also has a request for a very short extension for something like 76 days to 
> June 28, 2020. You will find both drugs on the last 3 pages of the United 
> States Patent and Trademark Office web site, which I have attached below. If 
> you click on the patent number to the left of the drug name, it will pull up 
> the actual application.
>
> You might also find the battle Novartis is having with India over patent 
> issues interesting. Google: Novartis gleevec patent in india.
>
> http://www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/terms/156.jsp
>
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 2:17 PM, Suzieq wrote:
>
> > Hello again from a very cold & snowy Missouri:
>
> > What great discussion this has been & hearing from all of you on the
> > differences of cost and what we've all been through....well, I've
> > enjoyed it a lot.
>
> > Had my six month's check up yesterday.  Doc says everything looks very
> > good.  I personally thought that my counts were a little bit low, but
> > think they've ran a little on the anemic side since the beginning and
> > no one seems concerned, so guess I shouldn't be either. (smile)  She
> > said that we'ld stay on the six month's visits unless there was a
> > noticeable change in the BCR-ABL that comes in a couple of weeks.  We
> > talked about my 7 year anniversary & she told me that I was in that
> > "pioneer" group of being on Gleevec for a long period & that right
> > now, no one (medical field) knows about whether it will be a cure for
> > CML or just what might occur down the road. I thought to myself, well
> > there are others who've been on it longer than me. (smile)  I don't
> > really feel much like a "pioneer",  but I am very happy that when I
> > was dx'ed,  there was a drug for it.
>
> > By the way,  who posted about Novartis getting the extension on the
> > patent for Gleevec? And, is there a link to the article?  My doc
> > hadn't heard anything about that.
>
> > And, a great big HOWDY to Skip & congrats for surviving going on your
> > 34th year with CML.  You inspire all the rest of us to keep fighting
> > each & every day!  God bless you and all you other's who've paved the
> > way before us!
>
> > Suzieq
>
> > --
> > [CMLHope]
> > A support group ofhttp://cmlhope.com
> > -------------------------------------------------
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "CMLHope" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/CMLHope
>
>

-- 
[CMLHope]
A support group of http://cmlhope.com
-------------------------------------------------

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CMLHope" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CMLHope

Reply via email to