On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 18:18:37 -0500 Richard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also don't think of Zope as a CMS and CMF; I think of it as an > application server (the Zope/ZODB part) and a CMS/F (the Zope CMF). That's kinda rough, especially as CMF is but one particular implementation of a CMF atop Zope, and is a deliberately incompleat one at that. Zope itself certainly fits the application server role, but its above there that things get foggy. Zope, CMF, Plone, variou sproducts (which variously do and don't have UIs or content roles), Silva, EasyPublisher, Neoboard, Icoya, etc etc etc. There's a little internally fertile and multiple cross-linked ecosystem in there. The Zope layering model doesn't deconstruct cleanly into well accepted terminology (which is mostly evidence that the terminology is flawed). -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. -- http://cms-list.org/ more signal, less noise.
