David Hanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > P.S.: I am just looking at SCL: what a pity that this work has not > > been done on CMUCL. (I would not mind paying for SCL, but I fear > > that it will lag behind CMUCL in other regions, e.g. Gerd > > Moellmanns pcl improvements.) > > This is a shame. The fragmentation really hurts lisp, IMO.
Well, one of the former core developers of CMUCL tries to make some money with it now. Who wants to throw the first stone? Not me... > I'd love to write some lisp code for a work project, i have that > degree of flexibility, but it has to do a substantial amount of > threading and sockets and be portable. So, c, here i come! Ack!! What about LispWorks and AllegroCL? Aren't they portable enough? Cheers, Edi.
