> > This is a shame. The fragmentation really hurts
> lisp, IMO.
>
> Well, one of the former core developers of CMUCL
> tries to make some
> money with it now. Who wants to throw the first
> stone? Not me...
Well, ok, i didn't mean it as a stone-throw at the SCL
people, more of a lament that there isn't even a
semi-portable threading library--things of that
nature.
>
> > I'd love to write some lisp code for a work
> project, i have that
> > degree of flexibility, but it has to do a
> substantial amount of
> > threading and sockets and be portable. So, c,
> here i come! Ack!!
>
> What about LispWorks and AllegroCL? Aren't they
> portable enough?
Not really. We need to run on windows, linux,
serverx, etc. Not to mention that i have issues with
the two lisp systems named above...
dave
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
