OK, OK, point taken. 

I think I'll print that list (and Uli’s caveat) and hang it on the wall, right 
next to the space I use for banging my head when struggling with Cocoa… :p


On 12 Dec 2013, at 18:46, Uli Kusterer <witness.of.teacht...@gmx.net> wrote:

> On 11 Dec 2013, at 16:01, Jens Alfke <j...@mooseyard.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 4:39 AM, 2551 <2551p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It’s certainly seemed the case to me that I would have probably spent less 
>>> time just writing my own code from scratch than I spend trying to figure 
>>> out how half the methods I’m trying to use should be implemented. 
>> 
>> That’s probably not actually true; our experience of time is pretty 
>> subjective, and time goes by faster when you’re in a ‘flow’ state than when 
>> you’re trying to figure out something new.
>> 
>> Even if it’s a bit faster to write your own code, using the system APIs is 
>> probably still a win because
>> (a) their implementations are almost certainly better debugged and more 
>> performant than your brand-new unused code;
>> (b) they will be improved and maintained by other people over time, saving 
>> you the trouble;
>> (c) they’ve been designed to be reusable, so you’ll be able to use them 
>> quickly in your next project;
>> (d) you can later hang out here explaining the APIs to noobs and make 
>> yourself look like a guru (or better yet, write books) ;-)
> 
> 
> Let's preface that with the statement that I agree with your conclusion.
> 
> Using Apple's code generally saves a lot of hassle and work because your code 
> has only you doing QA. Apple's code has all of Apple, plus you, plus everyone 
> else outside Apple who uses this API doing QA. It's bound to be more solid. 
> That said, Apple's code still has only whatever team at Apple is responsible 
> for that code fixing it. Only they have the source code.
> 
> So occasionally, when a piece of code isn't or stops being a priority for 
> Apple, item (b) above can actually be a liability. Still, we've seen how 
> people circumvent that with sync code and CoreData. People first use Apple's 
> code, getting a leg up and a release out the door and money in their coffers, 
> and can then afford to fund their own version.
> 
> -- Uli Kusterer
> "The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere..."
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to