JH>> In conclusion: JH>> 1. We need a patch for the HTMLSerializer for the namespace issue. JH>> 2. A validation transformer seems to be really welcome. JH>> 3. For human readability we do not need really a new JH>> serializer. What about the indent parameter on the serializer JH>> (like indent in <xsl:output/>)? -> patch
Agree, agree and agree BD> I'm convinced there is a place for a tidyserializer. Its BD> purpose is not BD> to replace the htmlserializer, but it provides some BD> features that can be BD> useful in some cases (mainly validation and beautifying). BD> FWIW, I'm +1 on adding the tidyserializer. Agree - I can imagine it *might* be useful, although all my troubles have been fixed with the above 3 points.
