Torsten Knodt wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 09:38, Bruno Dumon wrote: > >> TK> We have a current problem, that cocoon is not useable in many >> cases, TK> because it's nearly impossible to create valid (x)html. >> And again I'm wondering why? Of the tree reasons given earlier: >> AC> 1) As a fix for the "the namespace problem" >> AC> 2) When human-readable HTML output is needed >> AC> 3) To validate the output to a dtd >> only number 1 really causes problems, the others are merely >> conveniences. Those are important too, but don't make it "impossible >> to create valid (x)html". > The second is helpful to debug your output and the last is helpful to > ensure you output valid code. Would be nice to ensure valid output, > before sending out code which has the w3c compliance logo. I can do > all this with a script called after cocoon (which I still have to do > for non-html output). But TidySerializer is a cleaner solution.
<snip/> Torsten, *Please* put a blank line after the text you are quoting, before your reply. It makes it *so* much easier to read :) Thanks, J. ======================================================================= Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed to any third party without our permission. There is no intention to create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use of this email. Experian Limited (registration number 653331). Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF
