AC> > Bruno? BD> You expect me to give my blessing or so? I don't really care that much BD> about it all. Arguments 2 and 3 are reasonable, and certainly BD> have their uses.
You dropped the question (and I had my doubts too), so I tried to sum up the pro's and asked for your opinion. Blessing should be left over to others ;-) BD> What I wanted to avoid though is that problems with the normal HTML BD> serializer (like the namespace or textarea problem) would be hidden by BD> jtidy, and that users would be pointed to the tidyserializer as the BD> solution for these problems. One should not forget the performance BD> impact of the tidyserializer: it uses an additional thread and has to BD> reparse the serialized output. I agree completely. It should be clear that it might not be the solution to all problems. TK> BTW: You could provide CHTML rendering for the cocoon sample. Yes, that would be fun. I will. But I might need the TidySerializer for that.. ;) Thanks for the TidySerializer. Regards, Arje
