Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 21:09, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
In conclusion:
1. We need a patch for the HTMLSerializer for the namespace issue.
2. A validation transformer seems to be really welcome.
3. For human readability we do not need really a new serializer. What about the indent parameter on the serializer (like indent in <xsl:output/>)? At the moment you can set it to true, but this only adds line breaks AFAIK and does not indent the code. Maybe we simply need a patch too?
Back to the start...
I'm convinced there is a place for a tidyserializer. Its purpose is not to replace the htmlserializer, but it provides some features that can be useful in some cases (mainly validation and beautifying). FWIW, I'm +1 on adding the tidyserializer.
-0.1 for the known reasons
