On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 21:09, Joerg Heinicke wrote: > In conclusion: > 1. We need a patch for the HTMLSerializer for the namespace issue. > 2. A validation transformer seems to be really welcome. > 3. For human readability we do not need really a new serializer. What > about the indent parameter on the serializer (like indent in > <xsl:output/>)? At the moment you can set it to true, but this only adds > line breaks AFAIK and does not indent the code. Maybe we simply need a > patch too?
Back to the start... I'm convinced there is a place for a tidyserializer. Its purpose is not to replace the htmlserializer, but it provides some features that can be useful in some cases (mainly validation and beautifying). FWIW, I'm +1 on adding the tidyserializer. -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
