.................................
To leave Commie, hyper to
http://commie.oy.com/commie_leaving.html
.................................


>NO idea.  But there's bugs in Gnome, so I have to run KDE
>even tho it's the ugliest damn thing I've seen in a long time.

If you were a real hardcore linuxoid, you'd toss the graphic UI entirely. 
Lynx should be enough for any surfer! ;)

>I'd say that in general, plan to rely on RPM's not DEB's or whatever,
>bcos RPM's are the most common way for people to package up their stuff.

... and RPMs seem to be quite easy to use. I installed some RPM once, and 
it wasn't harder than installing stuff on Windows. (Of course you had to 
have enough user privileges to do installations, but I already knew 
_that_... ;)

>When I'm looking for a piece of software, I always check the Rufus
>index-by-name  http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/ByName.html
>
>It's a bit dangerous tho to mix your distros, they all have built-in
>assumptions, so when you grab stuff offa Rufus, try to stick to RPM's
>built on -- and for -- _your_ distro.

Aha, ok.

One thing that's rather strange to a newbie linuxphile @ rmpfind.net is the 
huge amount of libraries you should know about. When I download an RPM, I 
have to check through dozens of other files and maybe download them too.

Isn't there any "all needed libraries included" choice somewhere? Would be 
a bit easier.

> > Only a couple of years ago it was just there to launch
> > the programs and handle the files on your hard disk.
>
>Um, you're thinking of MS-DOS.  It was more properly termed a "program 
>loader".

Yeah, right... ;)

I meant that, for example, Windows and Mac OS didn't have native PPP 
support originally. And originally, on Windows,  to connect to internet 
with a fast line, you used a third party software called "Trumpet". Windows 
itself didn't natively have tcp/ip support.

And when the native PPP control panel came to Mac, it was so buggy, you 
usually used a third party alternative instead (FreePPP or some other)...

>Nowadays they're no longer afraid of the gov't and they try to put 
>EVERYTHING in.

Yeah! But customers, too, demand more and more stuff from the OS itself 
nowadays.

 From the OS-maker point of view, you can't compete with Windows, if your 
alternative OS choice doesn't ship with a browser, multimedia player, easy 
native internet connectivity helper apps, some sort of word processor, 
basic plugins for the browser, etc, etc, etc...

Even if you _could_ supply everything listed, you can't compete with 
Microsoft unless you have steady consumer-base and unique design (Apple), 
or unless everything listed is free (Linux).

No wonder why BeOS lost. They concentrated in core OS technology in times, 
when the most important thing is, what's _bundled_ with OS....

BTW, Palm didn't give (or sell) Be source code to BeUnited. Be people have 
started to concentrate their forces in making OpenBeOS. More info here: 
http://www.beunited.org/


---> jab | commie | http://commie.oy.com

             "Less is moo"
                 -- The Holy Mad Cow

Reply via email to