[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4077?focusedWorklogId=106216&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-106216
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-4077:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 27/May/18 20:19
            Start Date: 27/May/18 20:19
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: kennknowles commented on a change in pull request 
#5490: [BEAM-4077] Refactor schemas and fields, simplify a bit
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5490#discussion_r191087074
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
sdks/java/extensions/sql/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/sql/impl/interpreter/BeamSqlFnExecutorTestBase.java
 ##########
 @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ public static void prepare() {
             .typeSystem(TYPE_FACTORY.getTypeSystem())
             .build();
 
+    try {
+      Class.forName("org.apache.calcite.jdbc.Driver");
 
 Review comment:
   @apilloud this incantation appears in some old FlinkSQL bugs and also a book 
chapter on Apex SQL. Similar to the issue with our JDBC driver.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 106216)
    Time Spent: 1h 40m  (was: 1.5h)

> Refactor builder field nullability
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-4077
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4077
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: sdk-java-core
>            Reporter: Kenneth Knowles
>            Assignee: Kenneth Knowles
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently the Schema builder methods take a boolean for nullability. It would 
> be more standard to have separate builder methods. At this point the builder 
> might as well just take the Field spec since it does not add concision.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to