[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14989745#comment-14989745
]
Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-10365:
-----------------------------------------------
bq. I'm actually not that convinced it's worth pulling a new dependency for
dealing with nested UDT
It's already being pulled by the driver, and we depend on that, so whatevs.
> Store types by their CQL names in schema tables instead of fully-qualified
> internal class names
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-10365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Labels: client-impacting
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> Consider saving CQL types names for column, UDF/UDA arguments and return
> types, and UDT components.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
