olabusayoT commented on code in PR #1479:
URL: https://github.com/apache/daffodil/pull/1479#discussion_r2070457648
##########
daffodil-runtime1/src/main/scala/org/apache/daffodil/core/compiler/Compiler.scala:
##########
@@ -31,17 +31,21 @@ import scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
import scala.util.Try
import scala.xml.Node
+import org.apache.daffodil.api.compiler.{ ProcessorFactory =>
JProcessorFactory }
+import org.apache.daffodil.api.exceptions.{ InvalidParserException =>
JInvalidParserException }
+import org.apache.daffodil.api.{ CodeGenerator => JCodeGenerator }
+import org.apache.daffodil.api.{ DataProcessor => JDataProcessor }
Review Comment:
Re 2, The J prefix is because alot of the classes share the same name as
their Scala counterpart ex InfosetInputter, DataProcessor, so we needed to
rename them and J seemed like the best option. Any suggestions?
Re 1, we are also integrating the new JAVA API into our current backend for
compatibility @stevedlawrence is that right?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@daffodil.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
