DanielLeens commented on PR #12079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12079#issuecomment-6266728551

   Thanks @SEZ9 for the careful follow-up. I re-checked each open item against 
the current head `612b5ede517b5f7b800c2695c8e2f3e88a789b97` (the head is 
unchanged since my last review), and I believe all four are already closed on 
this head. Details with locations so you can verify directly:
   
   **1. F3 (single resolution path).** Transforms resolve their IDs exactly 
once, in the `ScheduledTransform` constructor: 
`TransformDependencyScheduler.java:235` calls 
`ConfigParserUtil.getInputIds(readonlyConfig)`, and exposes the results via 
`getOutputId()` (`:247`) and `getInputIds()` (`:251`). 
`DryRunConnectValidator.validateTransform` reads 
`scheduledTransform.getOutputId()` / `getInputIds()` (`:240`, `:242`) instead 
of re-parsing the config. There is no `getTransformInputIds` / 
`getTransformOutputId` helper left. The one remaining 
`getInputIds(readonlyConfig)` call in `DryRunConnectValidator` (`:305`) is in 
the sink validation path, which has no scheduler involvement, so it cannot 
diverge from transform scheduling.
   
   **2. F7 (docs).** Present in both languages: 
`docs/en/introduction/concepts/incompatible-changes.md:104` (`### Transform 
Dependency Resolution`) and 
`docs/zh/introduction/concepts/incompatible-changes.md:75` (the matching 
Transform dependency entry). They describe the fail-fast behavior 
(`JobDefineCheckException` at Zeta parse time, `ConfigCheckException` in 
connect dry-run), including explicit self-references in single-transform jobs. 
Your request to record in the PR description which previously accepted 
multi-transform configs now fail is also covered: the PR body states that the 
old resolver could loop indefinitely on cyclic graphs and could build a 
multi-input transform from only the inputs already available, silently dropping 
the remaining upstreams.
   
   **3. F8.** `getOutputId()` on `ScheduledTransform` has production callers 
(`MultipleTableJobConfigParser` and 
`DryRunConnectValidator.validateTransform`), and the static `getOutputId` 
helper no longer exists in `ConfigParserUtil`.
   
   **4. Build.** The required `Build` check is now `SUCCESS` for this head 
(completed 2026-10-19T05:22Z, fork run 
https://github.com/goutamadwant/seatunnel/actions/runs/39008501172). This is a 
statement about that specific run on `612b5ede5`, not about any later head.
   
   On my side there is no remaining source-side blocker, and I have not run 
anything locally. From here it only needs your final read and a write-capable 
committer to merge. Thanks again to @goutamadwant for the patient iteration on 
this one.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to