DanielLeens commented on PR #12511: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12511#issuecomment-6473613139
Thanks @SEZ9 and @Vivek1106-04 for closing the coverage discussion. The named cancel and non-cancel restore tests answer that documentation question; my existing technical clearance on this unchanged head stands. The current Build and effective repository approval are tracked separately below. I am not issuing a new full source review or claiming another person's approval as Daniel's. Gate snapshot (2026-10-28T15:46:44+00:00), head `a691fb195d32381b3a43560eba4586861366a6d8`: [Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/111623841460) is `SUCCESS`. CI was previously the only remaining technical gate in my conclusion; CI is now passing, so that CI objection is withdrawn and my technical conclusion is clear to proceed. Daniel currently has READ permission. I have not changed the effective GitHub review state to APPROVED; a write-capable maintainer must perform the final approve/dismiss action required by branch protection. Comparison recorded in this scan: base `dev`, `diverged`, ahead 4 / behind 237, no merge conflict. Branch drift is metadata here and is not an additional sync request. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
