DanielLeens commented on PR #10643: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10643#issuecomment-6514280832
Thanks @SEZ9; agreed. The aggregate timeout and two cancelled all-connectors-it-3 jobs remain CI execution gates, not evidence of a port-selection regression. Rerun those existing cancelled jobs and inspect an actual failed step if one appears. Current base supplies no demonstrated source cure for cancellation, so sync alone is not prescribed. My source conclusion remains clear; historical requested changes and final approval still require a write-capable maintainer once the gate is satisfied. Checked 2026-10-30T03:30:37.154604+00:00; head `1d50ab8212032104e46d4f2f4b465981526802b6`. [Signal pull request update](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/actions/runs/40630483881/job/122625443819)=`SUCCESS`; [Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/122625517828)=`TIMED_OUT`. Base `dev`, `diverged`, ahead 12/behind 63; merge `blocked`. This is an unchanged-head discussion/CI clarification, not another full source review or an effective approval. Daniel has READ repository permission. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
