DanielLeens commented on PR #11307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11307#issuecomment-6473936897

   Thanks for the contribution. The CI fact cited in my previous conclusion has 
changed; this follow-up updates that gate on the unchanged reviewed head, 
without issuing another full source review.
   
   Gate snapshot (2026-10-28T15:59:39+00:00), head 
`4b80eba2519f8a1d13a54229dbd2090d7fca8a9f`: 
[Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/122671703070) is `FAILURE`.
   
   The blocking jobs are [Run / unit-test (17, 
windows-latest)](https://github.com/goutamadwant/seatunnel/actions/runs/40644985034/job/122672493389)
 `failure`; [Run / unit-test (11, 
windows-latest)](https://github.com/goutamadwant/seatunnel/actions/runs/40644985034/job/122672493392)
 `failure`; [Run / all-connectors-it-3 (17, 
ubuntu-latest)](https://github.com/goutamadwant/seatunnel/actions/runs/40644985034/job/122672494118)
 `cancelled`; [Run / all-connectors-it-3 (11, 
ubuntu-latest)](https://github.com/goutamadwant/seatunnel/actions/runs/40644985034/job/122672494137)
 `cancelled`; [Run / connector-file-local-it (11, 
ubuntu-latest)](https://github.com/goutamadwant/seatunnel/actions/runs/40644985034/job/122672494528)
 `cancelled`.
   
   Observed log evidence: `Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin:2.22.2:integration-test 
(default) on project seatunnel-resource-managers-e2e: No tests were executed!  
(Set -DfailIfNoTests=false to ignore this error.) -> [Help 1]`
   
   Please inspect or rerun only the named failed job where a rerun is 
appropriate. The logs establish the failing stage, but do not alone establish 
whether the current PR caused it. No matching upstream cure has been proved by 
this follow-up; a base sync alone is not a verified resolution, so no unrelated 
module/dependency patch is requested.
   
   My [previous source 
conclusion](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11307#pullrequestreview-5681328887)
 remains clear for the reviewed scope. CI is not being passed by inference, and 
this follow-up is not an effective approval.
   
   Comparison recorded in this scan: base `dev`, `diverged`, ahead 69 / behind 
49, no merge conflict. Branch drift is metadata here and is not an additional 
sync request.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to