Thank you for your response on my second question, I check my archive and
revert back to you those items.
What about my first question on
How the decisions was made for the “No consensus” / “no objections?
Have a nice weekend.
Speaking on my own capacity.
On 17 Sep 2016 12:01 p.m., "Alan Barrett" <alan.barr...@afrinic.net> wrote:
> [posting only to community-discuss. Please do not cross-post]
> > On 16 Sep 2016, at 20:38, Bope Domilongo Christian <
> christianb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > After reading the document, I have two quick question before going to
> the substance of the changes.
> > 1. How the decisions was made for the “No consensus” / “no
> I read and listened to discussions, both on and off the mailing lists. If
> you think I misunderstood the discussion, or missed something, then please
> point it out.
> > 2. I remember that during the discussions, other propositions of
> amendment were made in addition to the points in your discussion document.
> Have these points been considered ?
> Please list those items.
> Alan Barrett
> Community-Discuss mailing list
Community-Discuss mailing list