[posting only to community-discuss.  Please do not cross-post]

> On 16 Sep 2016, at 20:38, Bope Domilongo Christian <christianb...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> After reading the document, I have two quick question before going to the 
> substance of the changes.
> 1.  How the decisions was made for the  “No consensus” /  “no objections”?

I read and listened to discussions, both on and off the mailing lists.  If you 
think I misunderstood the discussion, or missed something, then please point it 

> 2. I remember  that during the discussions, other propositions  of amendment 
> were made in addition to the points in your discussion document. Have these 
> points been considered ?

Please list those items.

Alan Barrett

Community-Discuss mailing list

Reply via email to