El vie, 06-05-2005 a las 10:03 -0400, Ted Husted escribiÃ: > On 5/5/05, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > El jue, 05-05-2005 a las 16:11 -0400, Ted Husted escribiÃ: > > > When you hook up Confluence with JIRA and Subversion, things start to > > > get very, very tasty. > > > > Am I the only one that is worried because both JIRA and Bugzilla are > > dark matter WRT search engines? > > > > I mean, it used to be easy to find information about bugs in mail lists, > > but now, with so called bug-tracking systems, it is more and more > > difficult. I'd call them both bug-hiding systems. > > The SOP should be for the issue trackers to log all changes to [EMAIL > PROTECTED]
What is SOP? dict.org is no help > > If that is happening, then it should be just as easy to find a > reference to an pending or resolved issue as it is to find any other > post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > True. JIRA does the right thing provided the changes are sent into a public list. Bugzilla, IIRC, is usually configured so that only assignee, reporter and other people commenting get copies, and this is definitely bad. This is what gnome, mozilla and other bugzilla installs do. Again, I feel strange that I rarely, if ever, come into a Google result coming from a bug tracking system (be it web or email) when I'm researching a difficult bug. "Regular" posts in -dev or -user lists are usually what enables my finding solutions. Puzzling. > -Ted. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> High Sierra Technology, SLU
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
