Hello Stuart Admittedly, I only skimmed over the text, but if you're referring to table 1, I think that three hours are a bit exaggerated when it comes to postproduction, processing, and distribution, even in a manual process. Of course I wouldn't know how much editing was going on, but with the production in HD, most of the time was probably copying/processing. If so, this would be similar in an automated (HD) lecture system, wouldn't it?
To me, another interesting fact was that full lecture capture was so popular in comparison to the short video segments, which seem to be pedagogical favourites at the moment. Olaf A. Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Stuart Phillipson Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Januar 2013 10:14 An: [email protected] Community Betreff: [Opencast] Paper with some useful data Hi All, Not sure if this is the best list for this, but I came across a paper recently contrasting what are essentially different styles of lecture capture and the production of added value learning resources. It contains some interesting data, for example estimates on the production time required for manual video lecture capture. http://cede.lboro.ac.uk/ee2012/papers/ee2012_submission_125_rdp.pdf My main reason for posting it here is that when I was putting together a business case for our lecture capture system I was looking for exactly these kind of figures to support our case. So hopefully this might prove useful to anyone in the same position. Best Regards Stuart Phillipson | Media Technologies Coordinator Room 1.023 Devonshire House University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Phone: 016130 60478
_______________________________________________ Community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/community To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
