Michael Williams wrote: > Would be cool if you could somehow also show the average memory > footprint and time used at each doubling for each program. > It would be cool, but each program is running on different hardware and machine which can be loaded up or not, so at best it would an average of all the programs running on various hardwares at different loads.
FatMan uses a fixed memory allocation and I think Mogo does too so I don't even have a simple way to know how much memory FatMan is "effectively" utilizing. The time factor is accessible, the tester reports this. In general you will see that each doubling of play-outs will take about twice as much time too. - Don > > Don Dailey wrote: >> I wish I had named the weakest players _00 instead of _01 and expressed >> everything as you are suggesting, it would indeed be clearer. >> I could actually fix this by reprogramming the scripts without changing >> the running programs. If I get a burst of energy perhaps ... >> >> The tarball is slightly interesting. I have it so that you untar into >> a directory, run a script and there is nothing left to have to do - >> every hour a summary of the results so far is ftp'd to my computer. >> This is so others can help me with the study. You can stop or restart >> the script at any time. >> So far, I am running two instances and I am running another instance on >> a friends computer remotely. >> Here is a simple riddle which I had to solve but made me think for a >> moment: >> >> It involves how to keep track of various versions of the result files >> which each user would send me every hour. Do you put a version number >> on it? How do you track which file belongs to which user and which is >> the latest version without mixing things up and duplicating data? >> My first reaction was to somehow label or stamp each file, perhaps with >> the hostname or something and a version number. But none of this is >> necessary. >> - Don >> >> >> >> >> >> Jeff Nowakowski wrote: >>> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 20:31 -0500, Don Dailey wrote: >>> >>>> Although it's not on the graph itself, Gnugo-3.7.11 level 10 is >>>> set to >>>> be 1800.0 ELO. >>>> >>> On the web page it says you are using --min-level 8 --max-level 8. >>> >>> >>>> Each data point in the x axis represent a doubling in power. >>>> There are >>>> 13 doublings represented >>>> >>> This is a bit confusing. I think it's clearer to say there is 1 >>> baseline and 12 doublings. It's also confusing on the web page that >>> Mogo_01 actually corresponds to 0 doublings in the graph. >>> >>> So if I understand correctly: >>> >>> Mogo_13 = 64 * 2^12 = 262,144 simulations >>> FatMan_13 = 1024 * 2^12 = 4,194,304 simulations >>> >>> Sorry for the minor nitpicks. Looking forward to the results! >>> >>> -Jeff >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> computer-go mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
