I think when I get some time, perhaps tonight, I will post a digest of all the games updated when the page is updated. In this way, if anyone else wants to analyze the data they can. It would be a simple text file with 1 line per game like this:
FatMan_03 FatMan_11 B+Resign Mogo_02 Mogo_10 B+5.5 Mogo_13 Mogo_06 W+16.5 Mogo_03 FatMan_05 B+3.5 Mogo_06 Mogo_11 B+21.5 - Don Heikki Levanto wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:07:30PM -0500, Don Dailey wrote: > >> FatMan is a CPU hog, I think it would be good to get a lot of data >> first, and then perhaps see what happens with FatMan 14. I would not >> put 15 in unless 14 showed an improvement. >> > > Fair enough! Although it is too early to say yet (as I have recently > learned), it looks a bit like Mogo could be suffering from a 'bad number' at > _15. Might still be the effect of one or two unlucky losses... > > Having two programs in the study seems like a good idea, otherwise it would > be just self-play, with the uncertainties that gives. > > >> I will do some statistics later on win/loss results for white and black >> at various ELO windows. It would interesting if we discovered that >> one color was winning a LOT of games - it would indicated that the play >> is getting really strong as David Fotland suggested. >> > > Good idea! > > - Heikki > > > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
