I also checks what the results were when both players were within 200 ELO of each other and BOTH were at least 2400 ELO and the score is 89 - 88 in white's favor.
So there doesn't seem to be any overwhelming advantage at these levels. - Don Don Dailey wrote: > Ok, what the heck. > > Not enough data to draw any conclusions, but I broke out the white and > black win percentages when both players were within specific 200 point > ELO windows. I ignored all other games. > > range wh bl wperc bperc > --------- --- --- ----- ----- > 1000-1199 7 9 0.44 0.56 > 1200-1399 11 5 0.69 0.31 > 1400-1599 4 7 0.36 0.64 > 1600-1700 26 18 0.59 0.41 > 1800-1999 52 43 0.55 0.45 > 2000-2199 14 9 0.61 0.39 > 2200-2399 10 17 0.37 0.63 > 2400-2599 42 51 0.45 0.55 > 2600-2799 15 22 0.41 0.59 > > > Seems to indicate that black has an advantage at higher levels. > > White won about 52% of ALL the games played. > > - Don > > > > > Don Dailey wrote: > >> FatMan is a CPU hog, I think it would be good to get a lot of data >> first, and then perhaps see what happens with FatMan 14. I would not >> put 15 in unless 14 showed an improvement. >> >> I hope to find an explanation for the sudden flattening out of FatMan, >> which could point to a general performance bug at lower levels too. >> >> I will do some statistics later on win/loss results for white and black >> at various ELO windows. It would interesting if we discovered that >> one color was winning a LOT of games - it would indicated that the play >> is getting really strong as David Fotland suggested. >> >> - Don >> >> >> Alain Baeckeroot wrote: >> >> >>> Le jeudi 24 janvier 2008, Don Dailey a écrit : >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi Hideki, >>>> >>>> No need to stop any of the weaker games since 99% of the compute time is >>>> consumed by the strongest half. >>>> >>>> Also, only the new mogo's will be scheduled to play until they catch up >>>> - however their opponent will almost always be the stronger players. >>>> The probability of one of them playing against an opponent in the lower >>>> half is low. >>>> >>>> - Don >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Is it planned to also add Fatman 14 15 16 ? >>> Or is there some impossibility ? >>> >>> Also it would be nice to have an order of magnitude of memory usage >>> and time used for each level. >>> >>> Thanks a lot for this great study >>> Alain >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> computer-go mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
