I'd like to see the benchmarks, anything that works better is better. I just don't see how a single drive can keep up with hundreds and hundreds of users hitting the drive compared to RAID. Also to note is cost, there may be better things than RAID that cost 10x as much...so RAID is the answer until the cost can be justified.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:16 PM, t.piwowar <t...@tjpa.com> wrote: > On Dec 24, 2009, at 9:59 PM, John DeCarlo wrote: > >> And please don't use "enterprise" as if it were an example of good >> engineering. I work at the enterprise level and have for years and I see >> more stupid things done by big enterprises with big IT staffs than in most >> SMBs. So many people there want to use the "old, reliable" methods. Even >> when it no longer makes much sense. >> > > Thank you. The point is that one has to keep up with technology. Last years > answer is last years answer. Or in the case of RAID, that's soooo 1999. > > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
